Table 2.
Prediction of the SIM and SAS motifs for the here studied TCP family members.
| AGI code | Name | TCP domaina (Position) | Predicted SIMb | Predicted SASb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Peptidec | Position | Peptidec | |||
| At1g67260 | TCP1 | 85–239 | – | – | 87 171 207 | KEIKKVVKKDRHSKI DVEQEEEKEEDDNGD KAGIRKKKSELRNIS |
| At1g53230 | TCP3 | 47–155 | 35–39 | NGGGCGEIVEVQGGHIVRS | 381 | EEHGGDNKPSSASSD |
| At1g58100 | TCP8 | 54–220 | 30–34 | RQLVDASLSIVPRSTPPED | 382** | NAVEHQEKQQQSDHD |
| At3g47620 | TCP14 | 115–289 | – | – | K46** 151** 268** | FPFQLLGKHDPDDNH LTRELGHKSDGETIE LNFHNPTKQEGDQDS |
| At1g69690 | TCP15 | 52–173 | 29–33 | TSSSSTSLAIISTTSEPNS | 164 | HQHQVRPKNESHSSS |
a
The coordinates of the TCP domains were predicted using PFAM (EMBL-EBI).
b
SIM and SAS motifs were predicted using GPS-SUMO 2.0.
c
In bold is indicated the hydrophobic residues that form the putative SIM or the lysine residue that acts as SUMO acceptor.
**
Predicted with low threshold stringency.