Table 4.
Secure attachment | Anxious attachment | Avoidant attachment | |
---|---|---|---|
G: Located | -0.38∗∗ | ||
behind owner | L: 0.29 (0.13–0.47)∗∗∗ | ||
H: 0.05 (0.00–0.12) | |||
AP: Oriented | 0.29∗ | ||
owner | L:0.01 (0.00–0.02)∗ | ||
H: 0.03 (0.02–0.05) | |||
VIS: Located | 0.33∗ | ||
close to owner | L: 0.00 (0.00–0.00)t | ||
H: 0.00 (0.00–0.00) | |||
SR: Lip licking | -0.29∗ | ||
during separation | L: 0.16 (0.11–0.26)∗∗ | ||
H: 0.08 (0.05–0.11) | |||
SR: Tail wagging | -0.28∗ | ||
at reunion | L: 0.89 (0.74–0.95)t | ||
H: 0.79 (0.64–0.89) | |||
AP: Located | -0.41∗∗ | ||
close to owner | L: 0.00 (0.00–0.00)∗∗ | ||
H: 0.00 (0.00–0.00) | |||
AUD: Located | 0.34∗ | ||
behind owner | L: 0.00 (0.00–0.00)∗ | ||
H: 0.04 (0.00–0.40) | |||
VIS: Oriented | 0.35∗ | -0.28∗ | |
stressor | L: 0.38 (0.26–0.56)∗ | L: 0.73 (0.41–1.00)t | |
H: 0.93 (0.39–1.00) | H: 0.35 (0.22–0.79) | ||
VIS: Latency to | -0.28∗ | 0.32∗ | |
contact | L: 43.00 (10.00–51.17)t | L: 5.00 (3.20–6.80)∗ | |
H: 9.00 (5.00–43.39) | H: 14.00 (6.24–50.30) | ||
AUD: Oriented | 0.30∗ | -0.46∗∗∗ | |
stressor | L: 0.62 (0.49–0.76)∗∗ | L: 0.88 (0.75–1.00)∗∗∗ | |
H: 0.83 (0.74–0.92) | H: 0.53 (0.47–0.70) | ||
VIS: Oriented owner | -0.46∗∗∗ | 0.31∗ | 0.33∗ |
L: 0.07 (0.05–0.13)∗∗ | L: 0.00 (0.00–0.05)t | L: 0.00 (0.00–0.05)∗∗ | |
H: 0.00 (0.00–0.04) | H: 0.06 (0.005–0.12) | H: 0.07 (0.01–0.12) |
Figures in bold were significantly different in correlation tests and in the additional Mann–Whitney U-tests. N (Correlation tests) = 51, N (Confidence low) = 24, N (Confidence high) = 24, N (Attachment anxiety low) = 20, N (Attachment anxiety high) = 20, N (Avoidant attachment low) = 25, N (Avoidant attachment high) = 20. tP ≤ 0.1; ∗P ≤ 0.05; ∗∗P ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001.
(VIS, visual stressor; AP, approaching person; AUD, auditory stressor; G, ‘Ghost’; SR, separation and reunion test), L = median in low scoring group (95% confidence interval), H = median in high scoring group (95% confidence interval).