Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;9:373. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00373

Table 6.

Effects between WM characteristics and processing speed performance.

Cerebrum Frontal Parietal Temporal Occipital
NAWM Volumeb B 0.213 0.147 0.203 0.219 0.114
SE 0.103 0.099 0.097 0.100 0.092
η2 0.020 0.010 0.020 0.022 0.007
p 0.040 0.139 0.038 0.030 0.215
WMH Volumea,b B −0.096 −0.103 −0.058 −0.035 0.001
SE 0.073 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.071
η2 0.008 0.010 0.003 0.001 <0.001
p 0.190 0.155 0.438 0.645 0.992
NAWM
FAc B 0.068 0.075 0.002 0.044 0.015
SE 0.074 0.075 0.075 0.071 0.071
η2 0.004 0.005 <0.001 0.002 <0.001
p 0.359 0.321 0.980 0.541 0.831
MDc B 0.169 −0.159 0.175 0.182 −0.098
SE 0.084 0.086 0.079 0.079 0.079
η2 0.020 0.017 0.024 0.026 0.008
p 0.047 0.065 0.028 0.022 0.215
WMH
FAc B 0.099 0.052 0.153 −0.011 0.036
SE 0.069 0.072 0.070 0.080 0.070
η2 0.010 0.003 0.023 <0.001 0.001
p 0.152 0.473 0.030 0.896 0.610
MDc B 0.169 −0.092 −0.119 −0.037 −0.033
SE 0.077 0.082 0.078 0.073 0.077
η2 0.023 0.006 0.012 0.001 0.001
p 0.029 0.266 0.128 0.618 0.667

FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; NAWM, normal appearing white matter; SE, standard error; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.

Significant results are indicated in bold, trends are indicated in italic.

a

Natural log transformed.

b

Adjusted for age, gender, education, blood pressure, and intracranial volume.

c

Adjusted for age, gender, education, blood pressure, intracranial volume, NAWM Volume, and WMH Volume.