Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 13;64(4):244–250. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.229

Table 1.

Results of X‐ray image assessment with and without video conference (VC) supervision

Variable Mean (standard deviation) t‐value P‐value
Without VC supervision With VC supervision
Required anatomy included 6.4 (2.9) 6.9 (2.4) −2.12 0.034
Patient positioning 6.7 (2.3) 7.2 (2) −2.65 0.008
Appropriate collimation 5.5 (1.8) 5.9 (1.4) −2.86 0.004
Image quality (including exposure) 6.3 (1.6) 7.0 (1.0) −5.94 <0.001
Diagnostic value of image 6.0 (2.4) 6.9 (2) −4.25 <0.001