Table 2.
Category | Criteria | Score |
---|---|---|
Portal inflammation | Mostly lymphocytic inflammation involving, but not noticeably expanding, a minority of the triads | 1 |
Expansion of most of all of the triads, by a mixed infiltrate containing lymphocytes with occasional blasts, neutrophils and eosinophils. If eosinophils are conspicuous and accompanied by edema and microvascular endothelial cell hypertrophy is prominent, acute antibody mediated rejection should be considereda | 2 | |
Marked expansion of most or all of the triads by a mixed infiltrate containing numerous blasts and eosinophils with inflammatory spillover into the periportal parenchyma | 3 | |
Bile duct inflammation damage | A minority of the ducts are cuffed and infiltrated by inflammatory cells andshow only mild reactive changes such as increased nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio of the epithelial cells | 1 |
Most or all of the ducts infiltrated by inflammatory cells. More than an occasional ductshows degenerative changes such as nuclear pleomorphism, disordered polarity and cytoplasmic vacuolization of the epithelium | 2 | |
As above for 2, with most or all of the ducts showing degenerative changes or foacal luminal disruption | 3 | |
Venous endothelial inflammation | Subendothelial lymphocytic infiltration involving some, but not a majority of the portal and/or hepatic venules | 1 |
Subendothelial infiltration involving most or all of the portal and/or hepatic venules with or without confluent hepatocyte necrosis/dropout involving a minority of perivenular regions | 2 | |
As above for 2, with moderate or severe perivenular inflammation that extends into the perivenular parenchyma and is associated with perivenular hepatocyte necrosis involving a majority of perivenular regions | 3 |
Added later in 2015 modification.