Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 5;13(1):66–75. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i1.3654

Table 2.

Comparison of the EBT2 film measured and published values of dose reduction by the applicator expressed as percentage of the dose of a bare source measured along its transverse axis.

Reduced Dose Value (%) Due to Applicator Attenuation
Ye et al. ( 13 )
Transverse Distance r (cm) EBT2 Film‐measured (Present Work) Experimental Monte Carlo
1 98.0 98.4 98.6
2 98.2 98.5 98.7
3 98.4 98.5 98.7
4 98.3 98.6 98.8
5 98.6 98.4 98.5
6 98.7 98.7 98.5