Table 3.
Factors | Dental Caries | Dental Plaque Accumulation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-value | Adjusted OR (95 % CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95 % CI) | ||
Biological characteristics | |||||
Ethnicity | Chinese | 0.006 | 2.13 (1.24-3.64) | 0.668 | 1.18 (0.55-2.52) |
Malay | 0.441 | 1.28 (0.68-2.42) | 0.338 | 0.65 (0.27-1.58) | |
Indian | 1 | 1 | |||
Mother’s Age | ≥34 years | 0.007 | 1.90 (1.20-3.03) | 0.808 | 0.93 (0.52-1.66) |
29-33 years | 0.087 | 1.50 (0.94-2.39) | 0.617 | 0.88 (0.53-1.45) | |
<28 years | 1 | 1 | |||
Mother’s Education Level | University | 0.132 | 0.75 (0.52-1.09) | 0.401 | 0.83 (0.54-1.28) |
≤GCE | 1 | 1 | |||
Maternal Health Status | Existing Condition | 0.011 | 0.61 (0.42-0.89) | 0.075 | 1.50 (0.96-2.34) |
No Existing Condition | 1 | 1 | |||
Prenatal Plasma Folate Level | ≥6 ng/mL | 0.002 | 0.39 (0.21-0.71) | 0.733 | 1.14 (0.54-2.42) |
<6 ng/mL | 1 | 1 | |||
Night-time Breast-feeding (3 Weeks) | Yes | 0.003 | 1.87 (1.24-2.83) | 0.307 | 1.27 (0.80-2.00) |
No | 1 | 1 | |||
Child’s BMI (24M) | kg/m2 | 0.002 | 1.18 (1.06-1.32) | 0.141 | 1.10 (0.97-1.24) |
Eruption Timing of First Tooth | Age in Months | - | - | 0.052 | 0.88 (0.78-1.00) |
Behavioural characteristics | |||||
Weaning onto Solids (9M) | Age in Months | - | - | 0.014 | 1.32 (1.06-1.64) |
Night-time Bottle-feeding (24M) | Yes | 0.136 | 1.35 (0.91-1.99) | 0.324 | 0.79 (0.50-1.26) |
No | 1 | 1 | |||
Child’s Dental Visits (9M-24M) | ≥Once | 0.049 | 2.31 (1.00-5.34) | <0.001 | 0.01 (0.01-0.02) |
None | 1 | 1 | |||
Parental Belief (Reason for Tooth Decay) (24M) | Sugar or Bacteria | 0.128 | 0.65 (0.38-1.13) | 0.728 | 1.13 (0.58-2.20) |
Sugar and Bacteria | 0.067 | 0.65 (0.41-1.03) | 0.650 | 1.16 (0.61-2.22) | |
Beliefs/Ineffective Tooth Brushing | 1 | 1 | |||
Parental Belief (Importance of Baby Teeth) | Yes | 0.078 | 0.58 (0.31-1.06) | <0.001 | 0.29 (0.16-0.54) |
No | 1 | 1 | |||
Child’s Daily Brushing Frequency (24M) | ≥Once | 0.012 | 1.88 (1.15-3.07) | 0.040 | 0.62 (0.39-0.98) |
None | 1 | 1 |
Sample Size=327
Variables in final model with p value >0.05 were added in the model since they are well-established risk factors/confounders for the outcome.
Modified Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for biprobit (p=0.67) and Murphy’s score test for biprobit (p=0.64)