Table 1.
Comparing classification performance of fully connected layers | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fc6 | fc7 | fc8 | fc6+fc7+fc8 | |||||
Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | |
RNFL Thickness | .973 | .972,.974 | .962 | .961,.964 | .956 | .954,.957 | .973 | .972,.974 |
RGC+ Thickness | .938 | .937,.940 | .936 | .934,.937 | .932 | .931,.933 | .935 | .934,.936 |
RNFL Probability | .961 | .960,.962 | .957 | .956,.958 | .958 | .957,.959 | .979 | .976,.980 |
RGC+ Probability | .920 | .920,.921 | .920 | .920,.920 | .913 | .911,.914 | .950 | .949,.951 |
en face Projection | .742 | .737,.747 | .697 | .692,.701 | .688 | .683,.694 | .758 | .754,.761 |
Combined | .945 | .944,.947 | .902 | .900,.903 | .885 | .884,.886 | .919 | .917,.920 |