Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2017 Dec;26(12):1086–1094. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000765

Table 4.

False positive/false negative rates and accuracy of typical clinical 24-2 visual field (VF) metrics. Further, a measure of improvement when using best HDLM method (RNFL Probability) with associated confidence intervals.

Performance of Clinical 24-2 VF Metrics
24-2 VF Metrics False Negatives
N=57
False Positives
N=45
Accuracy
N=102
Difference from Best HDLM 95% CI
MD 23 7 70.5% 24.28 24.12, 24.45
PSD 14 6 80.3% 11.58 11.42, 11.75
GHT 19 2 79.4% 12.58 12.42, 12.75
CC 9 17 74.5% 16.48 16.32, 16.65
PSD or GHT 13 7 80.4% 10.58 10.42, 10.75
Any 1 of 4 6 20 74.5% 16.48 16.32, 16.65

(MD = mean deviation, PSD = pattern standard deviation, GHT = glaucoma hemifield test, CC = 5-5-1 cluster criteria).