Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2017 Dec;26(12):1086–1094. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000765

Table 5.

False positive/false negative rates and accuracy of typical clinical 12-2 visual field (VF) metrics. Further, a measure of improvement when using best HDLM method (RNFL Probability) with associated confidence intervals.

Performance of Clinical 10-2 VF Metrics
10-2 VF Metrics False Negatives
N=57
False Positives
N=45
Accuracy
N=102
Difference from Best HDLM 95% CI
MD 27 7 66.7% 24.28 24.12, 24.45
PSD 21 3 76.5% 14.48 14.32, 14.65
CC 9 12 79.4% 11.58 11.42, 11.75
1 of 3 8 12 80.4% 10.58 10.42, 10.75

(MD = mean deviation, PSD = pattern standard deviation, GHT = glaucoma hemifield test, CC = 5-5-1 cluster criteria).