Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Sep 11;44:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.09.009

Table 2.

Summary of genetic variants examined

Variant Nearby gene Chr. Position Type of variant MA MAF from the current study MAF in a normal Caucasian populationc OR (p-value) from Nalls et al. study [4]d
rs10788972a TCEANC2 1 54572243 Intronic A 47.5% 44.0% 0.64 (6.2 × 10−8)
rs35749011 GBA/SYT11 1 155135036 Intergenic A 2.7% 2.2% 1.82 (1.4 × 10−29)
rs114138760b GBA/SYT11 1 154925709 Intronic C 1.8% 1.2% 1.57 (3.8 × 10−7)
rs823118 RAB7L1/NUCKS1 1 205723572 Intergenic C 44.8% 46.5% 0.89 (1.7 × 10−16)
rs10797576 SIPA1L2 1 232664611 Intronic T 13.9% 13.8% 1.13 (4.9 × 10−10)
rs6430538 ACMSD/TMEM163 2 135539967 Intergenic T 43.4% 49.7% 0.88 (9.1 × 10−20)
rs1955337 STK39 2 168272635 Intergenic A 12.5% 11.8% 1.21 (1.2 × 10−20)
rs12637471 MCCC1 3 182762437 Intronic A 20.3% 19.8% 0.84 (2.1 × 10−21)
rs34311866 TMEM175/GAK/DGKQ 4 951947 Missense C 24.4% 18.7% 1.27 (1.0 × 10−43)
rs34884217b TMEM175/GAK/DGKQ 4 950422 Missense G 8.4% 9.6% 0.80 (1.1 × 10−6)
rs11724635 BST1 4 15737101 Intronic C 43.3% 44.0% 0.89 (9.4 × 10−18)
rs6812193 FAM47E/SCARB2 4 77198986 Intronic T 37.6% 39.0% 0.91 (3.0 × 10−11)
rs356182 SNCA 4 90626111 Intergenic G 35.4% 36.2% 1.32 (4.2 × 10−73)
rs3910105b SNCA 4 89761420 Intronic C 49.1% 44.3% 0.84 (7.1 × 10−19)
rs9275326 HLA-DQB1 6 32666660 Intergenic T 8.5% 10.4% 0.83 (1.2 × 10−12)
rs13201101b HLA-DQB1 6 32375827 Intergenic T 5.2% 6.9% 1.19 (3.8 × 10−6)
rs199347 GPNMB 7 23293746 Intronic C 38.5% 38.3% 0.90 (1.2 × 10−12)
rs591323 FGF20 8 16697091 Intergenic T 25.6% 28.9% 0.92 (6.7 × 10−8)
rs117896735 INPP5F 10 119776815 Intronic A 1.2% 1.3% 1.62 (4.4 × 10−13)
rs329648 MIR4697 11 133765367 Intergenic T 35.5% 33.3% 1.11 (9.8 × 10−12)
rs76904798 LRRK2 12 40614434 Intergenic T 13.5% 12.7% 1.16 (5.2 × 10−14)
rs11060180 CCDC62 12 123303586 Intronic G 48.0% 43.5% 0.90 (6.0 × 10−12)
rs11158026 GCH1 14 55348869 Intronic T 32.7% 31.1% 0.90 (5.9 × 10−11)
rs2414739 VPS13C 15 61994134 Intergenic G 28.3% 27.9% 0.90 (1.3 × 10−11)
rs14235 BCKDK/STX1B 16 31121793 Synonymous A 41.5% 38.2% 1.10 (2.4 × 10−12)
rs11868035 SREBF/RAI1 17 17715101 Intergenic A 31.6% 33.8% 0.94 (6.0 × 10−5)
rs17649553 MAPT 17 43994648 Intronic A 22.8% 24.1% 0.77 (2.4 × 10−48)
rs12456492 RIT2 18 40673380 Intronic G 30.9% 33.8% 1.11 (7.7 × 10−12)
rs55785911 DDRGK1 20 3168166 Intergenic A 37.2% 38.7% 1.11 (3.0 × 10−11)

MA=minor allele; MAF=minor allele frequency; OR=odds ratio.

a

rs10788972 was included not due to a significant association in the Nalls et al. GWAS meta-analysis [4], but rather due to an association observed by the GWAS performed by Beecham et al. [18] which utilized neuropathologically confirmed PD patients and controls.

b

Indicates a variant included due to a significant association with risk of Parkinson’s disease risk that was independent of the other variant in the given gene that had the strongest association signal.

c

MAF in a normal Caucasian population was obtained using 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 data.

d

To be consistent with the results of our study, the OR from the Nalls et al. study that we provide is that associated with the minor allele of the given variant in our study.