Table 1. Summary of advantages and disadvantages of CT perfusion.
Categories | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Static CTP | CT coronary angiography and CT perfusion with single data set | Qualitative and semi-quantitative CTP analyses only |
Rapid analysis | Susceptible to artifacts | |
Less dependent on specific vendor technology | Timing of acquisition essential | |
Most data on diagnostic accuracy and outcomes | ||
Lower radiation dose | ||
Dynamic CTP | Qualitative, semi- and fully quantitative (mL/min/gram) measurements possible | Long breath hold |
Ability to observe first pass of myocardial perfusion, which may help mitigate some artifacts | More susceptible to patient and cardiac motion artifacts | |
Timing less critical than static CTP | Higher radiation dose | |
Increased image noise (due to multiple data sets being acquired) | ||
Longer and more complex analysis |
CTP, CT perfusion.