Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;8:2334. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02334

Table 2.

Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of 44 UPEC belonging to major clonal complexes (CC) or to other sequence types (ST).

Feature No. (%) of isolates by ST
Major UPEC clones Other STs
CC10 ST10 (n = 2) CC69 ST69 (n = 6) CC73 ST73 (n = 3) CC95 ST140 (n = 1) ST127 (n = 1) CC131 ST131 (n = 6) ST141 (n = 5) Singly occurring STsa (n = 20) Total (%)
VF GENES
afa 1 (50) 1 (16.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (13.6)
papAH 0 (0) 3 (50) 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 1 (100) 2 (33.3) 3 (60) 6 (30) 16 (36.4)
papC 0 (0) 3 (50) 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (33.3) 3 (60) 6 (30) 15 (34)
papEF 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 1 (33.3) 0 (0) 1 (100) 2 (33.3) 3 (60) 5 (25) 16 (36.4)
sfaS 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (100) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 5 (100) 4 (20) 13 (29.5)
yfcv 1 (50) 0 (0) 3 (100) 1 (100) 1 (100) 4 (66.7) 5 (100) 8 (40) 23 (52.3)
hlyA 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (100) 0 (0) 1 (100) 1 (16.6) 3 (60) 4 (20) 12 (27.3)
vat 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (100) 1 (100) 1 (100) 0 (0) 4 (80) 6 (30) 15 (34)
fyuA 1 (50) 4 (66.7) 3 (100) 1 (100) 1 (100) 6 (100) 5 (100) 10 (50) 31 (70.5)
iutA 2 (100) 5 (83.3) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 5 (83.3) 4 (80) 7 (35) 24 (54.5)
KpsMII 1 (50) 5 (83.3) 3 (100) 1 (100) 1 (100) 5 (83.3) 4 (80) 10 (50) 30 (68.2)
PAI 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (100) 1 (100) 1 (100) 4 (66.7) 5 (100) 8 (40) 22 (50)
traT 1 (50) 5 (83.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 2 (40) 8 (40) 20 (45.5)
VF score [mean, median, (range)] 3.5,3.5, (3–4) 5, 5, (2-7) 8, 7 (7–10) 6, 6, (6) 9, 9, (9) 6.5, 7, (5–7) 9.2, 11,(5–12) 4.1, 3.5 (0–11) 5.5, 5.5 (0–12)
AMR PHENOTYPEb
Pansusceptible 2 (100) 1 (16.6) 3 (100) 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (40) 13 (65) 22 (50)
Fosfomycin 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Nitrofurantoin 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Ciprofloxacin 0 (0) 1 (16.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (83.3) 0 (0) 1 (5) 7 (15.9)
Sulfamethoxazole 0 (0) 5 (83.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 1 (20) 4 (20) 14 (31.8)
Trimethoprim 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (50) 0 (0) 2 (10) 9 (20.5)
Ampicillin 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (83.3) 2 (40) 3 (15) 14 (31.8)
Cefotaxime 0 (0) 1 (16.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (50) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (9)
MDR 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (83.3) 2 (40) 2 (10) 13 (29.5)
ACQUIRED AMR GENESc
aac(6′)-Ib-cr 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (16.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.3)
blaCTX−M−14 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (16.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.3)
blaCTX−M−15 0 (0) 1 (16.6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (6.8)
mph(A) 0 (0) 4 (66.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (13.6)
a

Singly occurring ST included ST12 (n = 1), ST14 (n = 1); ST1193 (n = 1); ST59 (n = 1), ST349, (n = 1), ST108 (n = 1), ST841 (n = 1), ST58 (n = 1), ST4628 (n = 1), ST2628 (n = 1), ST1851 (n = 1), ST40 (n = 1), ST720 (n = 1), ST681 (n = 1), ST978 (n = 1), ST1001 (n = 1), ST4299 (n = 1), new ST (n = 3). The new STs were not assigned numerical designations by the E. coli MLST database (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli).

b

The most important antimicrobials for UTI treatment, as well as ß-lactams are shown. A detailed overview of all resistance profiles is given in Supplementary Table S2.

AMR, antimicrobial resistance; CC, clonal complex; MDR, multidrug resistance; ST, sequence type; UPEC, uropathogenic E. coli; VF, virulence factor.

c

None of the isolates harbored the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes mcr-1 or mcr-2.