Table 2.
Storytelling ability and camp-mate decisions
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log-odds estimate | Odds ratio | Log-odds estimate | Odds ratio | Log-odds estimate | Odds ratio | |
| Storytelling reputation | 0.56 [0.4; 0.72]*** | 1.75 | 0.78 [0.58; 0.98]*** | 2.17 | 0.67 [0.47; 0.87]*** | 1.95 |
| Primary kin (ref. non-kin) | — | — | 0.74 [0.35; 1.13]*** | 2.09 | 0.7 [0.31; 1.09]*** | 2.02 |
| Distant kin (ref. non-kin) | — | — | 0.59 [0.3; 0.88]*** | 1.81 | 0.57 [0.28; 0.86]*** | 1.77 |
| Spouse’s primary kin/primary kin’s spouse (ref. non-kin) | — | — | 0.59 [0.24; 0.94]*** | 1.81 | 0.57 [0.22; 0.92]** | 1.77 |
| Spouse’s distant kin/other affines (ref. non-kin) | — | — | 0.25 [0; 0.5]* | 1.29 | 0.24 [−0.01; 0.49]˙ | 1.27 |
| Spouse (ref. non-kin) | — | — | −0.25 [−0.98; 0.48] | 0.78 | −0.28 [−1.02; 0.46] | 0.76 |
| Reciprocity | — | — | 0.66 [0.46; 0.86]*** | 1.93 | 0.67 [0.47; 0.87]*** | 1.95 |
| Fishing reputation | — | — | — | — | 0.4 [0.13; 0.67]** | 1.5 |
| Hunting reputation | — | — | — | — | 0.24 [−0.03; 0.51]˙ | 1.27 |
| Tuber gathering reputation | — | — | — | — | 0.27 [0; 0.54]˙ | 1.31 |
| Medicinal knowledge reputation | — | — | — | — | 0.12 [−0.12; 0.36] | 1.12 |
| Camp influence reputation | — | — | — | — | 0.23 [−0.02; 0.48]˙ | 1.26 |
| Intercept | −0.88 [−0.68; −1.08]*** | 0.92 [0.35; 1.49]** | 0.97 [0.38; 1.56]** | |||
| Distance, age, and sex controls | No | Yes | Yes | |||
Models assessing the likelihood of skilled storytellers being selected in a ‘camp-mate’ network, using a logistic GEE regression (n = 291, dyads = 6534). All models contain camp size as a control variable (not displayed). 95% confidence intervals are displayed in brackets. ˙ P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001