Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;83(24):e01425-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01425-17

TABLE 2.

Prevalence of Campylobacter isolated from fecal samples of feedlot cattle before and after starling intervention

State Preintervention
Postintervention
No. of samples tested No. Campylobacter positive (%) No. of C. jejuni isolates (%)a No. of clone SA isolates (%)b No. of samples tested No. Campylobacter positive (%) No. of C. jejuni isolates (%)a No. of clone SA isolates (%)b
Iowa 400 280 (70.0) 245 (87.5) 7 (2.9) 400 273 (68.3) 242 (88.6) 9 (3.7)
Texas 250 170 (68.0) 144 (84.7) 12 (8.3) 326 244 (74.8) 223 (91.4) 30 (13.5)
Missouri 150 85 (56.7) 72 (84.7) 5 (6.9) 150 125 (83.3) 119 (95.2) 10 (8.4)
Colorado 360 274 (76.1) 202 (80.3) 6 (3.0) 398 319 (80.2) 236 (74.0) 8 (3.4)
Kansas 350 235 (67.1) 165 (63.8) 6 (3.6) 400 292 (73.0) 238 (81.5) 17 (7.1)
Total 1,510 1,044 (69.1) 828 (79.3) 36 (4.3) 1,674 1,253 (74.9) 1,058 (84.4) 74 (7.0)
a

The percentage is the proportion of C. jejuni isolates among the Campylobacter isolates.

b

The percentage is the proportion of clone SA isolates among the C. jejuni isolates.