Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;7:16962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17267-4

Table 2.

Accuracy, reaction times, mind-wandering ratings, and ratings of discomfort from tDCS.

Accuracy Reaction times Mind-wandering ratings Discomfort from tDCS
Before tDCS After tDCS Before tDCS After tDCS Before tDCS After tDCS
F mPFC 48.83 (0.37) 48.58 (0.34) 779.58 (28.45) 805.56 (36.10) 45.62 (6.30) 48.17 (9.26) 1.33 (0.14)
occipital 46.42 1.99) 46.58 (2.19) 873.33 (38.29) 903.49 (57.93) 58.19 (5.40) 57.02 (5.23) 1.58 (0.19)
sham 49.17 (0.21) 48.75 (0.30) 882.04 (66.18) 916.96 (57.17) 47.75 (8.18) 52.10 (8.29) 1.17 (0.11)
M mPFC 49.67 (0.19) 49.50 (0.19) 850.23 (32.42) 865.02 (29.7) 55.39 (5.43) 45.43 (8.67) 1.42 (0.19)
occipital 48.67 (0.36) 48.08 (0.68) 828.19 (34.02) 886.69 (47.24) 46.52 (9.50) 55.96 (10.67) 1.33 (0.14)
sham 49.08 (0.23) 48.33 (0.43) 872.79 (39.21) 920.61 (56.29) 54.77 (7.23) 67.52 (6.87) 1.17 (0.11)

Note. F = females; M = males; mPFC = participant group receiving cathodal tDCS on the medial prefrontal cortex; occipital = participant group receiving cathodal tDCS on the occipital cortex; sham = participant group receiving sham stimulation. Values in parentheses are standard errors of the mean.