Table 5.
Summary of support values for monophyletic genus Anopheles using fast site stripping.
| sites | n sites | program, model | monophyletic Anopheles | electronic supplementary material, figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| all | 1128 | Phylobayes, CAT-GTR | 0.47 | S20 |
| all | 1128 | Phylobayes, CAT-GTR | 0.50 | S21 |
| all | 1128 | RAxML, PROTCATJTTF | 0.28 | S22 |
| all | 1128 | Phyml, JTT+G+F | 0.04 | S23 |
| slow only, by diversity | 793 | Phylobayes, CAT-GTR | 0.205 | S24 |
| slow only, by diversity | 793 | RAxML, PROTCATJTTF | 0.31 | S25 |
| slow only, by diversity | 793 | Phyml, JTT+G+F | 0.31 | S26 |
| slow only, by TIGER | 774 | Phylobayes, CAT-GTR | 0.245 | 4 |
| slow only, by TIGER | 774 | RAxML, PROTCATJTTF | 0.48a | S27 |
| slow only, by TIGER | 774 | Phyml, JTT+G+F | 0.33 | S28 |
aNote that a consensus tree made from bootstraps of the RAxML analysis of TIGER sites shows monophyletic Anopheles (with 48% bootstrap support) while the RAxML tree for the same analysis, which had undergone more ML rearrangements, does not.