Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 21;17(5):107. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex086

Table 3.

Pairwise FST values for the comparison of sites (below diagonal) and P-values (above diagonal)

F FH G M PB LAB SP ST WHL WH W
F * 0.707 0.907 0.802 0.983 0.000 0.992 0.904 0.277 0.937 0.284
FH 0.002 * 0.493 0.198 0.666 0.000 0.435 0.466 0.243 0.766 0.394
G -0.002 0.004 * 0.116 0.250 0.000 0.980 0.517 0.445 0.537 0.284
M 0.000 0.009 0.011 * 0.455 0.000 0.170 0.314 0.177 0.611 0.035
PB -0.004 0.003 0.008 0.005 * 0.000 0.686 0.949 0.286 0.854 0.280
LAB 0.132 0.125 0.144 0.132 0.117 * 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SP -0.007 0.007 -0.005 0.012 0.003 0.137 * 0.600 0.835 0.796 0.232
ST -0.001 0.004 0.004 0.006 -0.002 0.128 0.004 * 0.134 0.755 0.155
WHL 0.010 0.011 0.007 0.012 0.010 0.148 0.001 0.012 * 0.573 0.136
WH -0.002 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.114 0.002 0.001 0.005 * 0.146
W 0.016 0.012 0.014 0.030 0.016 0.142 0.019 0.019 0.028 0.023 *

Significance level was 0.001 after Bonferroni-correction and significant values are indicated in bold. Site codes are given in Table 1.