Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 6;13(5):117–125. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3766

Table 2.

Estimates of group systematic error (M), systematic error (∑), and random error (σ) with different CBCT imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses in six head‐and‐neck patients.

Setup Error (mm)
CBCT Imaging MUs a CBCT Slice Thickness b (mm) Planning CT Slice Thickness c (mm) M SI σ M LR σ M AP σ
5 1 1
0.1
0.6 1.7 0.1 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.3 1.2
3
0.6
0.8 1.3
0.1
0.7 1.0
0.3
0.6 0.8
8 1 1
0.6
1.2 1.4 0.2 0.5 0.9
0.2
0.9 1.2
3
0.6
1.2 1.5 0.0 0.6 1.1
0.3
0.6 0.9
5 3 1
0.1
0.6 1.7 0.1 0.5 1.0 0.1 0.3 1.2
3
0.5
0.7 1.3
0.1
0.7 1.0
0.2
0.5 0.9
8 3 1
0.4
0.8 1.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.1 0.9 1.2
3
0.5
1.1 1.4 0.0 0.5 1.0
0.3
0.6 0.9
a

Compared with CBCT imaging MUs: FSI=0.637, p=0.430; FLR=0.712, p=0.404; FAP=0.206, p=0.653

b

Compared with CBCT slice thickness: FSI=0.0, p=1.0; FLR=0.105, p=0.747; FAP=0.526, p=0.472

c

Compared with planning CT slice thickness: FSI=1.682, p=0.202; FLR=0.826, p=0.369; FAP=2.377, p=0.131