Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 6;13(1):53–60. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000428

Table 3.

Differential effects of ARV drugs on the gut microbiome: summary of the main findings

Nowak et al. [29] Pinto-Cardoso et al., 2017 [30▪▪] Villanueva-Millán et al. [31▪▪]
Type of cohort Longitudinal Cross-sectional Cross-sectional
Sampling Feces and blood (plasma) Feces and blood (plasma) Feces and blood (plasma and serum)
Cohort 28 viremic HIV+ with pVL3 elite controllers9 HIV- controls 33 HIV+ on ART10 HIV- controls 45 HIV+ on ART5 untreated HIV+21 HIV- controls
Type of ART combinations and number of individuals (number per group) NNRTIs with NRTIs (n = 8)RTV-protease inhibitors with NRTIs (n = 11) NNRTIs with NRTIs (n = 18)RTV-protease inhibitors with NRTIs (n = 15) NNRTIs with NRTIs (n = 22)Protease inhibitors with NRTIs (n = 15)INSTIs with NRTIs (n = 8)
Time on ART 10 months 5 years 13 years
Effective ART suppression At 10-month follow-up: pVL < 40 (n = 15)pVL: median 60 (29–224; n = 4) pVL < 40 for all ART patients ART for at least 1 year and pVL less than 20 for at least 6 months
Markers of microbial translocation sCD14LPSLBP sCD14 sCD14LBP
Markers of endothelial damage/turnover/activation Not included I-FABP I-CAMV-CAM
Markers of systemic inflammation–immune activation IL-6D-Dimer IL-6D-DimerhsCRP% HLADR+ CD38+ CD8+ T cell IL-6
Effect of ARVs on alpha diversity (number of species) No differences were observed between NNRTIs and protease inhibitors↓↓↓ Number bacterial taxa in ART patients compared with baseline*** ↓ Protease inhibitors versus controls*↓ NNRTIs versus controls*≈ Protease inhibitors versus NNRTIs ↓↓ Protease inhibitors versus controls **↓ NNRTIs versus controls *≈ INSTIs versus controls≈ Protease inhibitors versus NNRTIs versus INSTIs
Effects of ARVs on microbial translocation Not assessedNegative correlation between LPS, LBP, sCD14, sCD163 and CD4+/CD8+ ratio ↑ sCD14 protease inhibitors versus controls*≈ NNRTIs versus controls≈ Protease inhibitors versus NNRTIs ↑ sCD14 protease inhibitors versus controls *↑ sCD14 NNRTIs versus controls *≈ sCD14 INSTIs versus controls
Effects of ARVs on gut microbiome ↓↓ In Firmicutes: Lachnospira spp.***, Oribacterium spp.***, Oscillospira spp.**); ↓↓ in proteobacteria (Sutturella spp.**) and ↓↓ in bacteroidetes (Prevotella spp.***) after ART initiation Differential clustering of gut microbiome with ART regimens (Adonis R2 = 10.37%***)↓↓↓ Ruminococcaceae family (including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) OTUs in HIV+ on ART versus controls ↑ Proteobacteria in ART versus controls↓ Firmicutes in protease inhibitors versus controls*↓ Number of bacterial species in protease inhibitors versus controls*13 genera depleted (↓↓↓) in protease inhibitors versus controls, against 7 for NNRTIs and 6 for INSTIsINSTIs cluster inside the control cluster↓↓↓ F. prausnitzii in protease inhibitors versus controls***↑↑↑ Desulfovibrio spp. and Blautia spp. in INSTIs versus controls***↑↑ Pseudomonas spp. in NNRTIs versus controls**
Effects of ARVs on systemic inflammation and immune activation No correlation between IL-6 and D-dimer and observed bacterial species ≈ Protease inhibitors versus NNRTIs≈ Protease inhibitors versus controls≈ NNRTIs versus controls ↑ IL-6 protease inhibitors versus controls**
Effects of ARVs on endothelial damage/turnover/activation Not assessed ↑↑↑ I-FABP protease inhibitors versus controls ***↑↑ I-FABP protease inhibitors versus NNRTIs **≈ NNRTIs versus controls ↑ I-CAM NNRTIs versus controls*↑ I-CAM INSTIs versus controls*↑↑ I-CAM protease inhibitors versus controls**↑↑ V-CAM protease inhibitors versus controls***
Main findings and conclusions Bacterial diversity correlated positively with CD4+ T-cell counts and negatively with markers of microbial translocation and monocyte activation Long-term ART does not restore richness of the gut microbiomeBPB are depleted in treated HIV infectionAbsence of BPB correlates with increased endothelial barrier damage INSTIs with NRTIs ART combination restores the richness of the gut microbiome to normal levels (control group)
Strengths Longitudinal study Dietary assessment Inclusion of INSTIs in ART cohortCo-infection with HCV and HBV
Limitations acknowledged by authors Did not control for dietLack of intestinal biopsies to corroborate findings in fecesControl group not matched for ethnical background Did not control for sexual practicesAbsence of untreated HIV+ individualsSmall number of HIV- individuals Did not control for confounding factors (HIV acquisition, diet)

Symbols to denote a significant increase (↑) or decrease (↓) or no differences (≈) were used. The asterisks (*), (**), (***) are used according to the P-values, P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively, as reported in the individual manuscripts.

ART, antiretroviral therapy; ARV, antiretroviral; BPB, butyrate-producing bacteria; HBV, Hepatitis B virus; HCV, Hepatitis C virus; HIV+, HIV-infected; HIV-, HIV-uninfected; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; I-CAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; I-FABP, intestinal-fatty acid-binding protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; INSTIs, integrase strand transfer inhibitors; LBP, LPS-binding protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NNRTIs, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NRTIs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; pVL, plasma viral load (copies/ml); RTV, ritonavir; sCD14, soluble CD14; V-CAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule.