Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 8;13(6):189–202. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3887

Table 3.

Summary of integral doses for nine‐field IMRT, double‐arc RA, and triple‐arc RA plans (average over 10 patients).

Parameter Nine‐field IMRT Double‐arc RA Triple‐arc RA (IMRT vs. Triple RA) p a (Double RA vs. Triple RA)
Total integral dose without BED correction, Gy·kg
207.0±28.8
207.3±30.0
208.8±29.9
0.29 0.05
Total integral dose with BED correction, Gy2·kg
176.6±24.8
176.0±25.1
177.5±25.2
0.58 0.08
NTID without BED correction, Gy·kg
156.3±21.7
155.9±23.1
157.5±23.3
0.45 0.04
NTID with BED correction, Gy2·kg
126.5±17.4
125.2±18.4
126.7±18.5
0.77 0.07
a

Statistical significance (p<0.05) is reported between couples, IMRT vs. triple RA, and double RA vs. triple RA, from Wilcoxon signed rank test.