Table 1.
Data analysis – the current work. Note that the angular spacings for X‐ray marker at each offset are identical, since they are derived from the single reference radiograph.
| Offset (mm) | Angular Spacing (degrees) | Deviation | Average Deviation (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X‐ray Marker | Dwell Positions | Angular Spacing (degrees) | Path Lengths (mm) | ||||
| 39 | 46 | 7.0 | 1.8 | ||||
| 76 | 57 |  |  | ||||
| 112 | 106 |  |  | ||||
| 148 | 144 |  |  | ||||
| 0 | 185 | 180 |  |  | 1.5 | ||
| 222 | 216 |  |  | ||||
| 258 | 255 |  |  | ||||
| 294 | 290 |  |  | ||||
| 331 | 330 |  |  | ||||
| 39 | 48 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 76 | 70 |  |  | ||||
| 112 | 109 |  |  | ||||
| 148 | 147 |  |  | ||||
| 1 | 185 | 181 |  |  | 0.7 | ||
| 222 | 219 |  |  | ||||
| 258 | 258 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| 294 | 295 | 1.0 | 0.3 | ||||
| 331 | 332 | 1.0 | 0.3 | ||||
| 39 | 47 | 8.0 | 2.1 | ||||
| 76 | 76 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| 112 | 116 | 4.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| 148 | 150 | 2.0 | 0.5 | ||||
| 2 | 185 | 184 |  |  | 0.8 | ||
| 222 | 224 | 2.0 | 0.5 | ||||
| 258 | 261 | 3.0 | 0.8 | ||||
| 294 | 298 | 4.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| 331 | 335 | 4.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| 39 | 47 | 8.0 | 2.1 | ||||
| 76 | 80 | 4.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| 112 | 118 | 6.0 | 1.6 | ||||
| 148 | 154 | 6.0 | 1.6 | ||||
| 3 | 185 | 191 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| 222 | 229 | 7.0 | 1.8 | ||||
| 258 | 264 | 6.0 | 1.6 | ||||
| 294 | 302 | 8.0 | 2.1 | ||||
| 331 | 341 | 10.0 | 2.6 | ||||
| 39 | 49 | 10.0 | 2.6 | ||||
| 76 | 85 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 112 | 121 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 148 | 157 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 4 | 185 | 194 | 9.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||
| 222 | 231 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 258 | 267 | 9.0 | 2.4 | ||||
| 294 | 77.2 | 307 | 80.4 | ||||
| 331 | 86.7 | 345 | 90.3 | ||||