Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 18;12(3):2–15. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3492

Table 3(b).

Comparison of estimation methods (pelvis).

Comparison p‐value
Side‐by‐side ‐ Registration 0.0047
Side‐by‐side ‐ Auto 0.4547
Registration ‐ Auto 0.0593