Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;102(12):4435–4447. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3716

Table 1.

Results of Random Effects Linear Models Investigating Differences Between STS Activity and Status (Normal/Cancer), Adjusted for Sex, Age, and BMI

Variable Samples (Patients)
Unadjusted Model, n = 122 (n = 61) Adjusted for Sex and Age, n = 122 (n = 61) Adjusted for Sex, Age, and BMI, n = 84 (n = 42) Adjusted for Sex, Age, BMI, and T Stage, n = 84 (n = 42) Adjusted for Sex, Age, BMI, and Dukes’ Stage, n = 84 (n = 42)
Change, % (95% CI) P Value Change, % (95% CI) P Value Change, % (95% CI) P Value Change, % (95% CI) P Value Change, % (95% CI) P Value
Cancera 24.8 (12.5 to 37.0) < 0.001 24.8 (12.5 to 37.0) < 0.001 24.6 (10.3 to 38.8) 0.001 24.6 (10.3 to 38.8) 0.001 24.6 (10.3 to 38.8) 0.001
Male sexb −17.6 (−36.1 to 0.8) 0.061 −21.8 (−37.2 to −6.3) 0.006 −20.6 (−36.4 to −4.7) 0.011 −23.3 (−39.9 to −6.7) 0.006
Age 0.5 (−0.3 to 1.4) 0.266 −0.2 (−0.9 to 0.4) 0.502 0.0 (−0.8 to 0.9) 0.961 −0.3 (−1.0 to 4.7) 0.466
BMI −0.0 (−1.5 to 1.4) 0.989 −0.1 (−1.6 to 1.4) 0.921 −0.1 (−1.7 to 1.5) 0.876
T stagec
 2 26.6 (−26.2 to 79.3) 0.323
 3 15.4 (−34.4 to 65.1) 0.546
 4 22.0 (−29.2 to 73.2) 0.400
Dukes’ staged
 B 2.1 (−23.6 to 27.8) 0.872
 C −2.0 (−26.1 to 22.0) 0.867
 D −32.2 (−87.0 to 22.5) 0.249

The outcome used in modeling was log transformed STS activity, and estimates can be interpreted as approximate percentage changes.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.

a

Reference was normal.

b

Reference was female.

c

Reference was stage 1.

d

Reference was stage A.