Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2015 Dec 11;13(1):016009. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016009

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Overall tracking performance for each of the three decoding methods. Performance was gauged by the number of successful trials per minute (mean ± 95% confidence bounds). Both monkeys had much higher success rates using both dual-state decoders than the standard, single-state decoder. Monkey M (red) performed slightly better using the proximity-based decoder than the neural-classifier decoder, but monkey C (blue) performed equally well with both.