Table.
Definition | Interpretation | Assumptions | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Additive interactions | ||||
RERI (relative excess risk due to interaction) | RR11 − RR01 − RR10 + 1 | Difference between the joint RR and the separate contributions by the two exposures | None when interpreted associationally; otherwise NUCA for one or both exposures | |
Attributable proportion |
|
Proportion of outcome risk in the doubly-exposed group attributable to interaction | None when interpreted associationally; otherwise NUCA for one or both exposures | |
Proportion of joint effect due to interaction |
|
Proportion of the joint effects that is attributable to interaction | None when interpreted associationally; otherwise NUCA for one or both exposures | |
Mechanistic interactions | ||||
Synergy | There exists an individual with D11 = 1 but D01 = D10 = 0. | Presence of a mechanism such that some individuals would experience the outcome under both exposures, but not under either exposure alone | NUCA; optionally monotonicity assumptions for less stringent tests | |
Compositional epistasis | There exists an individual with D11 = 1 but D01 = D10 = D00 = 0. | Presence of a mechanism such that some individuals would experience the outcome if and only if both exposures were present | NUCA; optionally monotonicity assumptions for less stringent tests | |
Other measures | ||||
Proportion of joint effect due to exposure 1 |
|
-- | None when interpreted associationally; otherwise NUCA for one or both exposures | |
Proportion of joint effect due to exposure 2 |
|
-- | None when interpreted associationally; otherwise NUCA for one or both exposures |
RERI indicates relative excess risk due to interaction; D = binary outcome variable; E1 and E2 = binary exposure variables. NUCA = “no-unmeasured-confounding assumptions” for one or both exposure-outcome relationships.5 where a, b ε{0,1}, which can be replaced with an odds ratio as appropriate to study design. Dab = potential outcome for D under an intervention setting E1 = a and E2 = b.