Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 6;8:1963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02033-x

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Silencing L2–L5 interneurons altered the locomotor step sequence pattern. ac Schematics of alternate and cruciate step sequence patterns (SSPs) as defined by footfall order (right panels, SSP illustrated as a series of circles interconnected with lines). SSPs are defined by the footfall order (does not measure the duration of swing–stance phases). d The alternate pattern predominates at control time points (Baseline: 83.0 ± 13.5%; Pre-DOX1: 82.3 ± 14.8%). d, e Silencing L2–L5 interneurons changed the pattern from alternate to cruciate (DOX1ON-D8: 33.5 ± 30.4% alternate, 48.4 ± 29.8% cruciate as compared to 7.7 ± 8.9% and 11.4 ± 9.0% at Baseline and Pre-DOX1, respectively). f, g This was reversed by DOX removal and replicated 1 month later (circles = individual means; bars = group mean ± S.D.; n = 47–66 step sequence patterns/time point; data shown as percentage of total patterns observed) (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc t-tests). LHL left hindlimb, RHL right hindlimb, LFL left forelimb, RFL right forelimb. d Baseline vs. DOX1ON-D8: p = 0.014, critical t = 0.41, df = 20; Pre-DOX1 vs. DOX1ON-D8: p = 0.006; critical t = 0.51, df = 20). e Baseline vs. DOX1ON-D8: p = 0.016; Pre-DOX1 vs. DOX1ON-D8: p = 0.032; DOX1ON-D8 vs. DOXOFF: p = 0.048; each comparison with a critical t = 0.33, df = 25. f Pre-DOX2 & DOX2ON-D3 vs. DOX2ON-D5: p < 0.001; each with critical t = 0.2, df = 10. g Pre-DOX2 & DOX2ON-D3 vs. DOX2ON-D5: p < 0.001; each with critical t = 0.3, df = 10. Illustrations by A. Pocratsky