Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 20;7(11):e016232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016232

Table 3.

Relationship between HIV and socioeconomic status from multivariate analysis

Variable Western Cape Province, aOR (95% CI) Free State Province, aOR (95% CI)
Age 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17) 1.07 (1.02 to 1.12)
Setting
 Urban informal 1.0 1.0
 Urban formal 0.12 (0.01 to 1.28) NA
 Rural formal NA 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)
Marital status
 Never married 1.0 1.0
 Currently married 0.77 (0.33 to 1.80) 0.98 (0.20 to 4.90)
 Divorced 0.76 (0.00 to 719.64) 0.44 (0.14 to 1.40)
 Separated 0.51 (0.01 to 23.71) 2.48 (0.21 to 29.71)
 Widowed 1.57 (0.03 to 90.49) 4.22 (0.51 to 34.81)
Years of formal education 0.90 (0.85 to 0.96) 0.99 (0.89 to 1.11)
Employment (employed vs unemployed) 1.54 (0.84 to 2.84) 0.96 (0.71 to 1.30)
Wealth quintile*
 Lowest quintile (poorest) 1.0 1.0
 Second lowest quintile 1.39 (0.29 to 6.56) 0.88 (0.67 to 1.16)
 Middle quintile 0.90 (0.08 to 10.57) 0.91 (0.72 to 1.16)
 Second highest quintile 0.77 (0.02 to 29.80) 0.93 (0.41 to 2.08)
 Highest quintile (wealthiest) 0.62 (0.00 to 250.83) 0.76 (0.16 to 3.71)

*Household wealth quintiles were generated separately for each province using data for the specified province only. Separate regression models were run for each province using household wealth quintiles generated separately for each province. Point estimates and their CIs were adjusted for the two-stage stratified cluster random sampling and design weights.

aOR, adjusted OR; NA, not applicable.