Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;7:17125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17019-4

Table 2.

Component correlations and their association with the predator-prey phase relationship.

Component correlations (r C) Association (r A mean ± s.d.)
Components Speed analysis Cost analysis
Effect on Effects of antiphase ¼ lag antiphase ¼ lag Speed Cost
Prey (W x) E x (x) − E u (x) −/0 −/0 0 −0.17 ± 0.34 −0.24 ± 0.30
E x (x) − E v (x) + + −/0/+ 0.82 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.32
E y (x) − E u (x) −/0/+ −/0/+ −/0 0/+ −0.25 ± 0.42 0.75 ± 0.08
E y (x) − E v (x) 0.27 ± 0.33 0.07 ± 0.46
E u (x) − E v (x) −/0 −/0 −/0 0.14 ± 0.49 0.77 ± 0.14
Predator (W y) E x (y) − E u (y) + + 0.91 ± 0.05 0.70 ± 0.14
E x (y) − E v (y) 0 0 0 0 −0.05 ± 0.39 0.08 ± 0.34
E u (y) − E v (y) −/0 0 −/0 0/+ 0.58 ± 0.23 0.36 ± 0.30

Left columns: component correlations r C found in the case of antiphase or ¼-lag cycles, categorized as positively correlated (r C > 0), negatively correlated (r C < 0) or uncorrelated (r C ≈ 0). Multiple classifications are possible for each component correlation, as some component correlations are not consistent across all parameter values. Results in these columns are based on visual inspection; they are not used in the calculation of the associations (r A, see Methods). Right columns: associations r A between the component correlations and the phase relationship.