Table 3.

Prevalence odds ratio of IPV by partner alcohol use

	Partner alcohol use (yes/no)	10% Difference in prevalence of alcohol use
	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Model 1: total effect (β1i)
	3.20 (2.94–3.48)	–
Model 2: partitioned within- (β1i) and between-country effect (γ1)
	2.22 (2.14–2.31)	1.40 (1.34–1.46)
Model 3: within- and between-country effect stratified by socioeconomic status (SES)
Main effect of alcohol (β1i, γ1)	2.71 (2.58–2.85)	1.35 (1.30–1.40)
Interaction with SES (β5, γ2)	0.83 (0.70–0.99)	0.98 (0.94–1.01)

Model 1: .

Model 2: .

Model 3:

Where partner alcohol use = exp(β₁) and prevalence of alcohol use = exp(γ₁).

CI, confidence interval; IPV, intimate partner violence; SES, socioeconomic status.