TABLE 3—
Characteristic | Exposed to Marijuana Advertising, Weighteda % (95% CI) | Pb |
Total | 54.8 (52.4, 57.1) | |
Gender (n = 3874)c | .73 | |
Male | 55.2 (51.4, 58.8) | |
Female | 54.3 (51.3, 57.3) | |
Age group (n = 3885), y | .08 | |
18–24 | 52.1 (41.8, 62.2) | |
25–34 | 57.0 (50.7, 63.0) | |
35–54 | 58.8 (54.8, 62.7) | |
55–64 | 53.8 (49.5, 58.0) | |
≥ 65 | 48.7 (45.2, 52.3) | |
Race/ethnicity (n = 3845)d | .60 | |
Non-Hispanic White | 54.2 (51.9, 56.5) | |
Non-Hispanic African American | 45.3 (27.4, 64.6) | |
Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native | 56.9 (38.3, 73.7) | |
Non-Hispanic Asian | 45.8 (29.6, 62.9) | |
Non-Hispanic multiple races | 70.3 (51.4, 84.1) | |
Hispanic | 55.0 (43.9, 65.6) | |
Education level (n = 3885) | .16 | |
< high school graduate | 56.1 (43.1, 68.3) | |
High school graduate or GED | 51.6 (47.0, 56.2) | |
Some college | 52.6 (49.5, 55.6) | |
College graduate | 60.1 (56.7, 63.4) | |
Home ownership (n = 3865)e | .32 | |
Own | 56.5 (53.8, 59.1) | |
Rent | 51.9 (47.1, 56.7) | |
Other arrangement | 51.7 (39.8, 63.4) | |
Marital status (n = 3885) | .01 | |
Married or domestic partnership | 57.5 (54.7, 60.4) | |
Never married | 55.4 (50.2, 60.6) | |
Divorced, widowed, separated | 47.2 (41.8, 52.7) | |
Metro resident (n = 3885) | .08 | |
Metro area resident | 56.8 (53.6, 59.9) | |
Not metro area resident | 52.6 (49.0, 56.1) | |
Marijuana use status (n = 3885) | .39 | |
Never user | 53.0 (49.4, 56.5) | |
Former user or experimenter | 54.9 (51.3, 58.4) | |
Current user | 57.6 (51.6, 63.5) | |
Marijuana store in neighborhood (self-report; n = 3885) | < .001 | |
Yes | 63.4 (59.4, 67.3) | |
No | 52.9 (49.6, 56.1) | |
Don’t know | 42.4 (36.1, 48.9) | |
Presence of marijuana store (registered dispensary; n = 3885) | < .001 | |
Yes | 56.5 (54.1, 58.9) | |
No | 32.5 (24.2, 42.0) |
Note. CI = confidence interval; GED = general education diploma. Online surveys were conducted in November 2015 and April–May 2016.
Data were weighted on the following factors: gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, home ownership, marital status, and metro area residency.
P value on the basis of Pearson χ2 comparing exposure to marijuana advertising across subgroups.
Removed responses of “transgender” (n = 11) for analysis because of small sample size.
Race/ethnicity was missing for 40 respondents.
Removed “don’t know” responses from denominator for analysis (n = 19).