Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 May 11;72:133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.009

Table 7.

Comparisons between the intervention and control conditions among the consenting participants for Phase 2.

Control Intervention Difference
N Mean SD Skew N Mean SD Skew
Baseline IAT 66 0.33 0.33 −0.17 42 0.33 0.30 −0.04 0.00 [−0.13, 0.12]
Concern 66 6.62 1.68 0.07 42 6.87 1.83 −0.20 0.25 [−0.43, 0.93]
Discrepancies 65 0.85 1.10 0.44 41 0.79 1.01 0.19 −0.06 [−0 45, 0.36]
Shoulds 66 1.59 0.90 1.91 42 1.54 0.90 2.01 −0.05 [−0 40, 0.30]
Woulds 65 2.45 1.14 0.69 41 2.34 1.01 0.63 −0.11 [−0.54, 0.32]
IMS 66 7.35 1.62 −0.90 42 7.45 1.40 −0.83 0.10 [−0.50, 0.70]
EMS 66 3.94 1.88 0.32 42 4.31 2.07 0.09 0.37 [−0.39, 1.14]
Attitudes 66 75.94 18.24 −0.46 42 75.83 18.90 −0.48 −0.11 [−.7.35, 7.13]
Follow-up IAT 23 0.06 0.51 −0.51 16 0.18 0.42 −0.69 0.11 [−0.20, 0.41]
Concern 51 6.72 2.53 −0.62 29 7.39 1.64 0.17 0.65 [−0.39, 1.69]
Discrepancies 50 1.40 1.17 0.65 28 1.85 1.08 0.11 0.44 [−0.08, 0.95]
Shoulds 51 1.24 0.39 1.93 28 1.20 0.28 1.09 −0.02 [−0.18, 0.14]
Woulds 50 2.64 1.28 0.59 29 3.03 1.18 0.18 0.50 [0.00, 1.00]
IMS 48 7.45 1.73 −1.25 26 7.37 1.41 −1.47 −0.14 [−0.88, 0.60]
EMS 48 4.54 2.49 0.14 26 4.71 2.19 0.39 −0.05 [−1.19, 1.09]
Donation 52 1.06 2.06 2.28 30 1.10 2.26 2.38 0.04 [−0.93 1.02]
Essay agreement 52 2.71 1.86 0.74 30 2.10 1.12 0.80 −0.61 [−1.36, 0.13]
Disagreeing comments 50 0.48 -- -- 29 0.79 -- -- 4.15 [1.51, 12.84] *

Note: For the baseline variables, the “Difference” column shows the mean difference between the intervention and control participants and its 95% CI. For the follow-up variables, the “Difference” column shows the difference and 95% CI, controlling for the baseline measurement of the variable in question (if the variable was measured at baseline). For the disagreeing comments variable, this difference is an odds ratio rather than a mean difference.