. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 7.

Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2017 Apr 25;24(5):733–744. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1311775

TABLE 4.

Study 3: Comparison of Specific Indirect Effects Across Method

Mediator	XMed	Delta		PROCESS
Mediator	Est.	Est. (SE)	95% CI	Est. (SE)	95% CI
Outstate	0.000	−0.007 (0.016)	[−0.038, 0.023]	−0.007 (0.031)	[−0.072, 0.042]
Room.Board	−0.039	−0.039 (0.013)	[−0.064, −0.014]	−0.039 (0.010)	[−0.068, −0.024]
Books	0.000	0.000 (0.004)	[−0.009, 0.008]	0.000 (0.003)	[−0.008, 0.005]
Personal	0.013	0.013 (0.008)	[−0.003, 0.029]	0.013 (0.010)	[−0.000, 0.037]
S.F.Ratio	0.000	−0.001 (0.003)	[−0.007, 0.004]	−0.001 (0.004)	[−0.013, 0.003]
Expend	0.036	0.051 (0.016)	[0.019, 0.083]	0.051 (0.027)	[0.004, 0.110]

Note. Estimates for XMed, Delta, and PROCESS are given, along with standard errors and 95% confidence intervals. PROCESS results are derived from bootstrapping.