Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0187517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187517

Table 3. Hazard ratio for CKD occurring during the initial regimen type.

Hazard ratio (95%CI) p
Crude model (unadjusted) 87 events
TDF+/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 3.14 (1.4–7.0) 0.005
TDF-/NNRTI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 1.22 (0.3–4.8) 0.77
TDF-/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 2.38 (1.0–5.5) 0.04
Adjusted model *
TDF+/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 3.07 (1.3–7.1) 0.009
TDF-/NNRTI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 1.26 (0.3–5.2) 0.74
TDF-/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 2.06 (0.8–5.0) 0.11
Causal approach
Weighted model
TDF+/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 2.71 (1.3–5.6) 0.007
TDF-/NNRTI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 1.18 (0.3–4.4) 0.81
TDF-/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 2.13 (1.0–4.6) 0.05
Double robust estimators
TDF+/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 3.25 (1.5–6.9) 0.002
TDF-/NNRTI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 1.18 (0.3–4.5) 0.81
TDF-/rbPI vs. TDF+/NNRTI 2.08 (0.9–4.6) 0.07

*All model were adjusted for age at initiation, CD4 cell count nadir, baseline CD4 cell count, baseline viral load (HIV-1 RNA), baseline eGFR, year of ART initiation, gender, HIV exposure (homosexual vs. heterosexual vs. other), HCV or HBV co-infections, prior diabetes, prior hypertension, prior cardiovascular disease, time-varying CD4 cell count and time-varying viral load