Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0188974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188974

Table 3. Pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds of the Hcon/Qcon ratio for hamstring strain injury prediction, by different cut-off score.

Cut-off score TP FP FN TN Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+ LR-
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
[%] [%] [%] [%]
Hcon/Qcon <0.47 2 18 10 310 16.7 (2.1–4.8) 94.5 (91.5–96.7) 10 (1.2–31.7) 96.9 (94.3–98.5) 3.04 (0.79–11.63) 1.67 (0.24–11.43)
Hcon/Qcon <0.6 6 174 6 154 50.0 (21.1–78.9) 46.9 (41.4–52.5) 3.3 (1.2–7.11) 96.2 (92.0–98.6) 0.94 (0.53–1.67) 1.06 (0.59–1.89)
Hcon/Qcon <0.658 11 249 1 79 91.7 (61.5–99.8) 24.1 (19.6–29.1) 4.3 (2.1–7.4) 98.8 (93.2–99.9) 1.21 (1.01–1.45) 0.35 (0.05–2.28)

TP–true positives, FP–false positives, FN–false negatives, TN–true negatives, CI–confidence interval

PPV–positive predictive value

NPV–negative predictive value

LR+–positive likelikood ratio

LR-–negative likelihood ratio