Table 2. Use of β-blockers in management of MFS patients.
Study/authors (reference) | Type of study | Study population (Marfan syndrome) | Drug | Results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shores et al. 1994 (11) | Randomized control trial | 70 patients: 32 treated, 38 untreated | β-blocker: (propanolol) | (I) ↓ in aortic root dilatation in treated group (P<0.001). (II) No change in clinical outcome | Small sample size and no placebo used |
Silverman et al. 1995 (17) | Retrospective data review | 417 patients: 191 treated, 142 untreated, 84 unknown status of treatment | β-blockers: propanolol (n=14); atenolol (n=100); metoprolol (n=5); nadolol (n=50); >1 β-blocker (n=22) | Higher probability of survival in treated group (P<0.01) | No randomized control group |
Salim et al. 1994 (18) | Clinical trial (non-randomized) | 113 patients: 100 treated, 13 untreated | β-blockers: propanolol; atenolol | Aortic root dilation greater in untreated group | Outcomes were not significant |
Selamet Tierney et al. 2007 (19) | Case control study | 63 patients (<18 years of age): treated 29, untreated 34 | β-blockers: atenolol | No sig change in aortic root dilation | – |
Rios et al. 1999 (10) | Clinical trial (non-randomized) | 23 patients treated | Atenolol | Heterogeneous response to β-blockers in aortic compliance | No control group |
MFS, Marfan syndrome.