Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov;6(6):654–661. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.11.09

Table 2. Use of β-blockers in management of MFS patients.

Study/authors (reference) Type of study Study population (Marfan syndrome) Drug Results Comments
Shores et al. 1994 (11) Randomized control trial 70 patients: 32 treated, 38 untreated β-blocker: (propanolol) (I) ↓ in aortic root dilatation in treated group (P<0.001). (II) No change in clinical outcome Small sample size and no placebo used
Silverman et al. 1995 (17) Retrospective data review 417 patients: 191 treated, 142 untreated, 84 unknown status of treatment β-blockers: propanolol (n=14); atenolol (n=100); metoprolol (n=5); nadolol (n=50); >1 β-blocker (n=22) Higher probability of survival in treated group (P<0.01) No randomized control group
Salim et al. 1994 (18) Clinical trial (non-randomized) 113 patients: 100 treated, 13 untreated β-blockers: propanolol; atenolol Aortic root dilation greater in untreated group Outcomes were not significant
Selamet Tierney et al. 2007 (19) Case control study 63 patients (<18 years of age): treated 29, untreated 34 β-blockers: atenolol No sig change in aortic root dilation
Rios et al. 1999 (10) Clinical trial (non-randomized) 23 patients treated Atenolol Heterogeneous response to β-blockers in aortic compliance No control group

MFS, Marfan syndrome.