Table 3.
Linear regression analysis to estimate cycle ergometer V̇O2peak based on anthropometrics and arm crank physiological outcomes.
| Model | Variables | r2 | Adj. r2 | SEE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (L·min-1), LBMLL (%), LBMUL (%), TLBM (%), ACEHRpeak (beats·min-1), ACEVEpeak (L·min-1), ACERERpeak, Gendera | .900 | .450 | 5.556 |
| 2 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (L·min-1), LBMLL (%), LBMUL (%), TLBM (%), ACEHRpeak (beats·min-1), ACEVEpeak (L·min-1), ACERERpeak | .900 | .633 | 4.536 |
| 3 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), LBMLL (%), LBMUL (%), TLBM (%), ACEHRpeak (beats·min-1), ACEVEpeak (L·min-1), ACERERpeak | .900 | .725 | 3.929 |
| 4 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), LBMLL (%), LBMUL (%), TLBM (%), ACEVEpeak (L·min-1), ACERERpeak | .900 | .779 | 3.518 |
| 5 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), LBMLL (%), LBMUL (%), TLBM (%),ACERERpeak | .892 | .802 | 3.336 |
| 6 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), LBMLL (%),TLBM (%),ACERERpeak | .886 | .821 | 3.168 |
| 7 | CEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), ACEV̇O2peak (ml·kg-1·min-1), LBMLL (%),TLBM (%) | .872 | .824 | 3.138 |
CEV̇O2peak, V̇O2peak in the cycle ergometer; ACEV̇O2peak, V̇O2peak in the arm crank test; LBMLL, lean body mass lower limbs; LBMUL, lean body mass upper limbs; TLBM, total lean body mass; ACEHRpeak, peak heart rate in the arm crank ergometer; ACEVEpeak, peak VE in the arm crank ergometer; ACERERpeak, peak RER in the arm crank ergometer.
a Coded ‘0’ for men and ‘1’ for women.