Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov;5(22):451. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.05

Table 1. POCT candidates and their respective characteristics.

Names Samples ID AST Delay Performances Comments
CRP/PCT Blood No No <10 min CRP: Se, 56–88%; Sp, 86–91% (17,18) No clinical data for use in VAP
PCT: Se, 78–100%; Sp, 75–97% (16)
Accelerate PhenoTM ETA Yes Yes 10.2 (range, 8.3–11.5) h (29) Se, 100%; Sp, 97% (31) Not officially available for POCT use
LightCycler 2.0 SeptiFastTM (37) BAL Yes No N/A 82% identification (vs. 35% for culture) Not officially available for POCT use
Clavel et al. (custom technique) (38) BAL, ETA Yes No 2.5 h (BAL), 3.25 h (ETA) BAL: Se, 89.2%; Sp, 97.1% Automation could allow POCT use, quantitative analysis available
ETA: Se, 71.8%; Sp, 96.6%
CuretisUnyveroTM P50 ETA Yes Yes 6.5 (range, 4.7–18.3) h (41) More sensitive than cultures, 45% to 70% agreement (36,41) 40% reported partial or complete test failure in POCT use (41)
MinIONTM (39) Mini-BAL Yes Yes ID, 9 h; AST, 48 h N/A (100% agreement for n=2) Not limited by primers, limited available data
VOCs analysis (49) Exhaled gases Yes No <60 min Se, 75.8%±13.8%; Sp, 73.0%±11.8% No invasive sample collection
β-LACTA™ Blood, ETA No Yes 30 to 120 min (52,56) Se, 80–95%; Sp, 71–100% Using respiratory samples requires preparation and bacterial growth

ID, pathogen identification; AST, antibiotics susceptibility test; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; ETA, endotracheal aspirates; BAL, broncho-alveolar lavage; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; VOCs, volatile organic compounds; N/A, not available.