. 2017 Dec 8;48:86. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0491-9

Table 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Species	Strain	Source
C. jejuni	KC40	Environment chicken^a*⁺
	7P-6.12	Chicken^a+
	10C-6.1	Chicken^a+
	10KF-1.16	Chicken^a+
	10KF-4.12	Chicken^a+
	10VTDD-8	Chicken^a+
	KC59.1	Chicken^a*
	KC64.1	Chicken^a*
	KC67.1	Chicken^a*
	KC84.1	Chicken^a*
	KC96.1	Chicken^a*
	KC101	Environment chicken^a*
	Cam12/0214	Human^b
	Cam12/0231	Human^b
	Cam12/0146	Human^b
	Cam12/0152	Human^b
	Cam12/0173	Human^b
	Cam12/0197	Human^b
	Cam12/0156	Human^b
	Cam12/0190	Human^b
	Cam12/0202	Human^b
	Cam12/0222	Human^b
	Cam12/0183	Human^b
C. coli	52/P	Chicken^c
	70/P	Chicken^c
	K43/5	Chicken^c
	KC7	Chicken^c
	MB3361	Chicken^c
E. coli	TG1	[68]
	DH5α	[69]
	WK6	[70]

* The fla-DGGE analysis is described in Najdenski et al. [51].

⁺The MLST results are described in Hermans et al. [30].

^aIsolates obtained from a poultry farm or a slaughterhouse, provided by Dr. Marc Heyndrickx (Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Technology and Food Science Unit—Food Safety, Melle, Belgium).

^bClinical isolates obtained from faeces of infected patients, provided by Dr. D. Martiny (Microbiology Department, Iris-lab, Brussels, Belgium). MLST analysis showed that the isolates belong to different clonal complexes (CC-21, CC-464, CC-21, CC-206, CC-48, CC-45) (D. Martiny, personal communication).

^cIsolates obtained from chickens, provided by Dr. Marc Heyndrickx (Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Technology and Food Science Unit—Food Safety, Melle, Belgium).