Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 16;9(2):30–45. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i2.2750

Table 4.

Dose difference for specific percentage volumes (V) between the three schemes in case 2

Percentage volume (%) Scheme 2 – Scheme 1 Dose difference (%) Scheme 3 – Scheme 1 Scheme 3 – Scheme 2
WNT=20
WNT=40
WNT=60
WNT=80
WNT=100
WNT=20
WNT=40
WNT=60
WNT=80
WNT=100
WNT=20
WNT=40
WNT=60
WNT=80
WNT=100
VTV(90)
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0 0 1 0 1
VTV(80)
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
VCO1(60)
5
5
6
5
5
7
8
7
7
7
2
3
1
2
2
VCO1(40)
5
5
6
6
6
8
8
8
8
7
3
3
2
2
1
VCO2(60)
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
2
2
3
0 0 0 0 0
VCO2(40)
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
0 0 0 0 0
VCO3(60)
0
1
1
1
2
1 0
1
1
1
1 1 0 0 1
VCO3(40)
0
1
1
1
2
0 0
1
1
1
0 1 0 0 1
VNT(50)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 0 0 0 0
VNT(30)
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
0 0 0 0
1
0 0 0

W=weightingfactor; NT=normaltissue; TV=targetvolume; CO=criticalorgan