Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 28;6(11):e006524. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006524

Table 2.

Risk of CVD and Stroke by Baseline Plasma Concentrations of Choline Metabolites in the PREDIMED Study

Variable HR (95% CI) for Quartiles of Plasma Metabolite Concentration P Trend Value HR (95% CI) per 1‐SD Increment
1 2 3 4
CVD
 TMAO
No. of cases 43 69 58 59
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.44 (0.90–2.28) 1.13 (0.70–1.80) 1.25 (0.78–1.99) 0.60 1.04 (0.89–1.21)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.37 (0.85–2.22) 1.08 (0.66–1.76) 1.09 (0.67–1.77) 0.94 1.01 (0.85–1.18)
 Betaine
No. of cases 51 57 60 61
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.94 (0.59–1.48) 1.03 (0.66–1.61) 0.77 (0.49–1.21) 0.30 0.89 (0.77–1.03)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.00 (0.63–1.60) 1.23 (0.77–1.97) 0.91 (0.77–1.49) 0.87 0.95 (0.82–1.12)
 Choline
No. of cases 34 43 68 84
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.03 (0.62–1.71) 1.30 (0.78–2.14) 1.55 (0.96–2.52) 0.03 1.21 (1.02–1.43)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.08 (0.64–1.81) 1.48 (0.89–2.46) 1.72 (1.05–2.81) 0.01 1.24 (1.05–1.46)
 Phosphocholine
No. of cases 46 58 57 68
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.16 (0.73–1.85) 1.29 (0.81–2.05) 1.40 (0.89–2.24) 0.12 1.09 (0.92–1.28)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.18 (0.73–1.93) 1.27 (0.77–2.08) 1.41 (0.87–2.28) 0.15 1.09 (0.92–1.30)
 α‐Glycerophosphocholine
No. of cases 51 56 47 75
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.89 (0.56–1.42) 0.79 (0.50–1.26) 1.26 (0.81–1.97) 0.30 1.20 (1.00–1.44)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 0.99 (0.62–1.57) 0.92 (0.57–1.51) 1.42 (0.89–2.28) 0.14 1.24 (1.03–1.50)
 Choline metabolite score
No. of cases 39 64 57 106
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.26 (0.77–2.05) 1.09 (0.64–1.81) 1.91 (1.20–3.04) <0.001 2.07 (1.25–3.41)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.33 (0.81–2.19) 1.25 (0.74–2.11) 2.21 (1.36–3.59) <0.001 2.27 (1.36–3.80)
 Betaine/choline ratio
No. of cases 74 52 63 40
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.70 (0.46–1.08) 0.86 (0.56–1.30) 0.50 (0.32–0.78) <0.001 0.77 (0.66–0.90)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 0.73 (0.47–1.14) 0.86 (0.55–1.34) 0.57 (0.35–0.92) 0.04 0.80 (0.68–0.94)
Stroke
 TMAO
No. of cases 24 38 31 25
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.32 (0.74–2.35) 1.06 (0.58–1.94) 0.91 (0.49–1.69) 0.55 0.93 (0.77–1.12)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.19 (0.65–2.17) 0.98 (0.53–1.84) 0.78 (0.41–1.49) 0.31 0.89 (0.73–1.10)
 Betaine
No. of cases 27 32 32 27
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.08 (0.61–1.91) 1.06 (0.60–1.86) 0.73 (0.39–1.34) 0.29 0.91 (0.75–1.11)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.15 (0.64–2.04) 1.32 (0.74–2.36) 0.89 (0.46–1.71) 0.85 1.00 (0.81–1.23)
 Choline
No. of cases 19 24 31 44
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.04 (0.54–2.00) 1.18 (0.59–2.33) 1.58 (0.84–2.99) 0.10 1.24 (0.98–1.56)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.08 (0.56–2.09) 1.33 (0.67–2.62) 1.73 (0.91–3.29) 0.06 1.27 (1.02–1.59)
 Phosphocholine
No. of cases 23 26 29 40
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.95 (0.51–1.79) 1.33 (0.72–2.44) 1.67 (0.94–2.98) 0.04 1.23 (0.99–1.53)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 0.96 (0.50–1.84) 1.28 (0.66–2.46) 1.70 (0.93–3.11) 0.05 1.25 (1.00–1.57)
 α‐Glycerophosphocholine
No. of cases 31 23 23 41
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.63 (0.34–1.18) 0.63 (0.35–1.15) 1.15 (0.67–1.98) 0.52 1.17 (0.91–1.50)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 0.68 (0.36–1.26) 0.71 (0.38–1.35) 1.29 (0.74–2.25) 0.31 1.22 (0.96–1.55)
 Choline metabolite score
No. of cases 21 25 22 50
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 1.10 (0.58–2.09) 0.78 (0.40–1.53) 1.94 (1.07–3.50) 0.03 1.83 (1.13–2.97)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 1.21 (0.63–2.33) 0.88 (0.44–1.76) 2.27 (1.24–4.16) 0.01 2.07 (1.25–3.44)
 Betaine/choline ratio
No. of cases 38 26 33 21
Multivariable model 1 Ref. 0.68 (0.39–1.20) 0.88 (0.52–1.52) 0.54 (0.30–0.97) 0.08 0.78 (0.64–0.95)
Multivariable model 2 Ref. 0.73 (0.41–1.30) 0.91 (0.52–1.61) 0.66 (0.35–1.26) 0.31 0.83 (0.66–1.03)

Inverse normal transformation was applied to raw values of metabolites. To build the score, we applied a weighted sum of concentrations of 5 metabolites in the choline pathway (TMAO, betaine, choline, phosphocholine, and α‐glycerophosphocholine). The betaine/choline ratio was calculated by dividing the raw values and then applying inverse normal transformations. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, family history of premature heart disease, and smoking and was stratified by intervention group (only in the overall analyses). Model 2 was adjusted as for model 1 and for physical activity (metabolic equivalent task units in min/d), hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. CI indicates confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; PREDIMED, Prevention With Mediterranean Diet; Ref., reference; and TMAO, trimethylamine N‐oxide.