Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):e007058. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007058

Table 2.

FRS by Sample Characteristics (N=908)

Characteristics N Mean SD P Value
Study site
Kingston (Ontario, Canada) 172 13.7 8.2 <0.001
Saint‐Hyacinthe (Quebec, Canada) 183 14.3 8.3
Tirana (Albania) 188 27.7 14.4
Manizales (Colombia) 198 18.0 10.8
Natal (Brazil) 167 23.6 16.1
Age in 2 categories, y
64–69 498 17.6 11.9 <0.001
70–74 410 21.8 14.1
Childhood economic adversitya
No 507 18.5 12.7 0.012
Yes 400 20.7 13.6
Childhood social adversitya
No 674 19.7 13.5 0.546
Yes 233 19.0 11.9
Education site specificb
Low 372 21.0 13.5 <0.001
Medium 301 20.2 14.1
High 235 16.2 10.3
Incomec
Poor 313 18.5 12.1 0.218
Middle 412 20.2 13.5
High 171 19.7 14.1
AFB, yd
<20 188 23.2 14.9 <0.001
20–24 355 20.8 13.8
25–29 169 16.3 10.5
≥30 93 17.7 11.7
Nulliparous 100 14.8 9.0
Paritye
Nulliparous 100 14.8 9.0 <0.001
1–3 501 19.0 12.5
≥4 302 21.8 14.6

AFB indicates age at first childbirth; and FRS, Framingham Risk Score.

a

One missing value.

b

Site specific, for women only.

c

Two missing values.

d

Three missing values.

e

Five missing values.