Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 24;6(10):e005610. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005610

Table 2.

hs‐CRP Level of Different Individuals Selected for Study

Variables Total Sample (N=101 510) Years of Exposure to cumhs‐CRP Exclude (N=48 445) P Value
Nonexposed (N=29 496) 1‐Exposed (N=14 433) 2‐Exposed (N=6147) 3‐Exposed (N=2989)
06hs‐CRP, mg/L 0.76 [0.3, 2.16] 0.46 [0.20, 0.97] 1.05 [0.39, 2.83] 4.00 [1.80, 7.60] 7.00 [4.90–9.50] 0.90 [0.33, 2.30] <0.001
08hs‐CRP, mg/L 1.60 [0.80, 3.30] 1.00 [0.60, 1.61] 2.70 [1.20, 4.10] 4.50 [3.40, 6.50] 5.60 [4.30, 8.70] 1.60 [0.80, 3.30] <0.001
10hs‐CRP, mg/L 1.03 [0.50, 2.50] 0.75 [0.37, 1.30] 1.58 [0.70, 3.50] 3.13 [1.11, 5.20] 5.90 [4.20, 9.40] 0.99 [0.30, 2.30] <0.001
Lgcumhs‐CRP 081±0.43 0.52±0.27 1.06±0.27 1.31±0.22 1.48±0.22 0.43±0.01 <0.001

06hs‐CRP indicates high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein in 2006; 08hs‐CRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein in 2008; 10hs‐CRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein in 2010; cumhs‐CRP, cumulative high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; Lgcumhs‐CRP, The cumulative hs‐CRP needed to be log‐transformed.