Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;109(4):djw259. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw259

Table 1.

Comparison of distribution of age, number of positive nodes, treatment, tumor size, grade, and surgery type between ER-positive patients included in the present study and those who were excluded

Included ER+ patients (n = 1065)
Not included ER+ patients (n = 999)
Variable No. (%) No. (%) P*
Age, y .53
 <50 511 (48.0) 466 (46.7)
 ≥50 553 (52.0) 533 (53.3)
Tumor size, cm <.001
 ≤2.0 481 (45.4) 566 (57.4)
 2.1-4.0 465 (43.9) 319 (32.3)
 ≥4.1 114 (10.7) 102 (10.3)
Positive lymph nodes .17
 1–3 722 (67.8) 708 (71.2)
 4-9 300 (28.2) 244 (24.5)
 ≥10 43 (4.0) 43 (4.3)
Tumor grade .004
 Well 120 (11.3) 152 (15.2)
 Moderate 499 (46.9) 456 (45.7)
 Poor 405 (38.0) 318 (31.8)
 Unknown 41 (3.8) 73 (7.3)
Treatment .16
 AC 519 (48.7) 518 (51.8)
 AC-P 546 (51.3) 481 (48.2)
Surgery type .007
 Lumpectomy 461 (43.3) 492 (49.3)
 Mastectomy 604 (56.7) 507 (50.7)
*

All statistical tests were chi-square distributed. All P values were one-sided. AC = doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; ER = estrogen receptor; P = paclitaxel.