Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017402

Table 1.

Cost parameters, their sources and ranges for sensitivity analyses

Resource Cost (€*), mean Cost (€*),
SD
Source Distribution
ICU bed-day 1583 226 AP-HP Gamma
Universal strategies
Hand hygiene Alcohol-based hand rub 0.011 0.0055 47 48 Gamma
HCW’s time per hand hygiene 0.143 0.0714 47 Gamma
Infection control nurse at half-time/month† 2048‡ 164 AP-HP Gamma
Antibiotic stewardship Infectious disease physician at half-time/month† 5500‡ 273 AP-HP Gamma
Targeted strategies
Screening Screening test+laboratory costs 40 20 48–50 Gamma
Contact precautions (=hand hygiene at 80%/80% with identified ESBL-PE patients) Alcohol-based hand rub 0.011 0.0055 47 48 Gamma
HCW’s time per hand hygiene 0.143 0.0714 47 Gamma
Cohorting (additional HCW+contact precautions) Additional full-time HCW/month† 3598‡ 642 AP-HP Gamma
Alcohol-based hand rub 0.011 0.0055 47 48 Gamma
HCW’s time per hand hygiene 0.143 0.0714 47 Gamma

Costs of control strategies were based on material and personnel. For example, the cost of the HH improvement strategy included the cost of HH (hand rub and HCWs’ time) and the cost of an infection control nurse working on the programme, that is, HH education, observation and feedback.

*€1=US$0.94.

†Assumption based on expert opinion.

‡Cost of staff from a hospital perspective (salary+employer contributions).

AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; ESBL-PE, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae; HCWs, healthcare workers; HH, hand hygiene; ICU, intensive care unit.