Table 1.
Resource | Cost (€*), mean | Cost (€*), SD |
Source | Distribution | |
ICU bed-day | 1583 | 226 | AP-HP | Gamma | |
Universal strategies | |||||
Hand hygiene | Alcohol-based hand rub | 0.011 | 0.0055 | 47 48 | Gamma |
HCW’s time per hand hygiene | 0.143 | 0.0714 | 47 | Gamma | |
Infection control nurse at half-time/month† | 2048‡ | 164 | AP-HP | Gamma | |
Antibiotic stewardship | Infectious disease physician at half-time/month† | 5500‡ | 273 | AP-HP | Gamma |
Targeted strategies | |||||
Screening | Screening test+laboratory costs | 40 | 20 | 48–50 | Gamma |
Contact precautions (=hand hygiene at 80%/80% with identified ESBL-PE patients) | Alcohol-based hand rub | 0.011 | 0.0055 | 47 48 | Gamma |
HCW’s time per hand hygiene | 0.143 | 0.0714 | 47 | Gamma | |
Cohorting (additional HCW+contact precautions) | Additional full-time HCW/month† | 3598‡ | 642 | AP-HP | Gamma |
Alcohol-based hand rub | 0.011 | 0.0055 | 47 48 | Gamma | |
HCW’s time per hand hygiene | 0.143 | 0.0714 | 47 | Gamma |
Costs of control strategies were based on material and personnel. For example, the cost of the HH improvement strategy included the cost of HH (hand rub and HCWs’ time) and the cost of an infection control nurse working on the programme, that is, HH education, observation and feedback.
*€1=US$0.94.
†Assumption based on expert opinion.
‡Cost of staff from a hospital perspective (salary+employer contributions).
AP-HP, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; ESBL-PE, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae; HCWs, healthcare workers; HH, hand hygiene; ICU, intensive care unit.