Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017387

Table 11.

Cost-effectiveness analysis (German model)

Study Costs, €mean (95% CI) p Value CUR, €/QALY (95% CI) ICUR, €/QALY
(95% CI)
CURR,
(95% CI)
p Value %CE25k %CE30k ICER €/QALYG
(95% CI)
∆C1000
∆E1000
QALYG
Brandes153 14 905 (14 586 to 15 225) <0.001 24 292 (20 263 to 28 321) 4421 (2090 to 6752) 1.22 (1.10 to 1.35) 0.061 53.57% 76.5% 28 706 (−5529 to 62 940) 5 561 695 193.8
Strik155 31 539 (30 863 to 32 215) <0.001 61 250 (53 939 to 68 561) 41 379 (37 491 to 45 267) 3.08 (2.83 to 3.34) <0.001 0.00% 0.0% 367 368 (−710 070 to 1 444 806) 22 195 135 60.4
Abacioglu156 14 379 (14 071 to 14 687) <0.001 33 429 (30 717 to 36 141) 13 558 (11 791 to 15 325) 1.68 (1.57 to 1.80) <0.001 0.12% 1.8% −92 957 (−352 869 to 166 956) 5 035 150 −54.2
Berrocal157 16 721 (16 362 to 17 079) <0.001 48 419 (39 174 to 57 665) 28 548 (23 705 to 33 391) 2.44 (2.16 to 2.71) <0.001 0.31% 0.7% −43 717 (−91 130 to 3697) 7 377 172 −168.8
WA (1–4) 17 922 (17 538 to 18 306) <0.001 39 967 (35 985 to 43 949) 20 096 (17 787 to 22 405) 2.01 (1.86 to 2.16) <0.001 0.04% 0.3% −291 167 (−1 869 626 to 1 287 291) 8 577 947 −29.5
WA (2–4) 18 043 (17 657 to 18 430) <0.001 40 845 (36 926 to 44 763) 20 973 (18 692 to 23 255) 2.06 (1.90 to 2.21) <0.001 88.8% 99.2% −226 212 (−1 153 427 to 701 004) 8 699 523 −38.5
WA (2–3)* 18 138 (17 750 to 18 527) <0.001 40 424 (36 758 to 44 091) 20 553 (18 384 to 22 722) 2.03 (1.89 to 2.18) <0.001 0.02% 0.2% −302 629 (−1 934 133 to 1 328 875) 8 794 882 −29.1
Sahinbas23 9344 (9199 to 9488) 1.000 19 871 (17 719 to 22 024) 0 1.00 1.000 88.8% 99.2% 0 0 0.0

*Main comparator.

∆C1000, costs difference per 1000 patients; %CE30k, %CE at CET €30 000; CUR, cost-utility ratio; ∆E1000, effect difference per 1000 patients (QALY gained); ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; mEHT, modulated electrohyperthermia; RCUR, relative CUR; TMZ, temozolomide; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; QALYG, QALY gained.