Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017387

Table 12.

Cost-effectiveness analysis (US model)

Study Costs, US$mean (95% CI) p Value CUR, US$/QALY (95% CI) ICUR, US$/QALY
(95% CI)
CURR,
(95% CI)
p Value %CE30k %CE50k ICER US$/QALYG
(95% CI)
∆C1000
$
∆E1000
QALYG
Brandes153 22 106 (18 799 to 25 413) 0.003 36 028 (28 866 to 43 189) 3324
(−1280 to 7927)
1.10
(0.96 to 1.25)
0.472 3.01% 84.02% 34 727
(−12 095 to 81 549)
6 728 332 193.8
Strik155 46 775 (39 779 to 53 772) <0.001 90 841 (76 123 to 105 558) 58 136 (50 122 to 66 151) 2.78
(2.45 to 3.11)
<0.001 0.02% 0,21% 519 683
(−1009,423 to 2 048 790)
31 397 527 60.4
Abacioglu156 21 325 (18 135 to 24 515) 0.007 49 579 (42 820 to 56 338) 16 875 (12 433 to 21 317) 1.52
(1.35 to 1.68)
<0.001 0.17% 51,27% −109 798
(−426 187 to 206 591)
5 947 408 −54.2
Berrocal157 24 799 (21 089 to 28 508) <0.001 71 811 (56 003 to 87 619) 39 107 (30 569 to 47 644) 2.20
(1.89 to 2.51)
<0.001 0.26% 1,56% −55 827
(−122 100 to 10 445)
9 420 880 −168.8
WA (1–4) 26 580 (22 604 to 30 555) <0.001 59 276 (50 498 to 68 053) 26 571 (21 289 to 31 853) 1.81
(1.61 to 2.02)
<0.001 0.08% 2,34% −380 229
(−2 447 832 to 1 687 373)
11 201 761 −29.5
WA (2–4) 26 760 (22 757 to 30 763) <0.001 60 577 (51 756 to 69 398) 27 873 (22 572 to 33 174) 1.85
(1.64 to 2.06)
<0.001 0.06% 1,96% −295 965
(−1 515 454 to 923 523)
11 382 070 −38.5
WA (2–3)* 26 901 (22 877 to 30 925) <0.001 59 954 (51 427 to 68 481) 27 249
(22 075 to 32 423)
1.83
(1.63 to 2.04)
<0.001 0.06% 2,04% −396 520
(−2 540 572 to 1 747 533)
11 523 498 −29.1
Sahinbas23 15 378 (12 703 to 18 052) 1.000 32 704 (27 215 to 38 193) 0 1.00
(1.00 to 1.00)
1.000 4.45% 94,60% 0 0 0.0

*Main comparator.

∆C1000, costs difference per 1000 patients; %CE50k, %CE at CET $50 000; CUR, cost-utility ratio; ∆E1000, effect difference per 1000 patients (QALY gained); ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; mEHT, modulated electrohyperthermia; RCUR, relative CUR; TMZ, temozolomide; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; QALYG, QALY gained.