Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017387

Table 5.

Comparison of dose-dense temozolomide trials: response and survival

Study NOP Response OS Survival since relapse
Total EFR CR ORR BRR MST mo (95% CI) MST mo (95% CI) 1-Year OS (95% CI) MTTP (95% CI)
Brandes153 33 33 3% 9% 61% N/A 9.1 (7.1 to 14.5) 38% 3.7 (2.8 to 6.3)
Strik155 18 18 17% 22% 61% 16.4* (17.9†) 8.35* (9.1†) (N/A) N/A N/A
Abacioglu156 16 14 0% 7% 57% N/A 7 (5.7 to 8.2) 0% 3.0 (1.8 to 4.2)
Berrocal157 47 27 0% 7% 38%* N/A 5.1 (3.7 to 8.5)‡ N/A 2.0 (0.9 to 3.1)
Norden154 55 54 0% 13% 48% 11.7 (8.1 to 16.2) N/A N/A 1.8 (1.8 to 2.8)
Sahinbas23 54 15 7% 20% 53% 20.8 (15.2 to 25.1) 7.7 (5.7 to 9.4)§ 29.5% (15.5–43.6) N/A

*Corrected data (the originally reported survival in months is derived from weeks by division to 4 (eg, 32.8 weeks=8.2 months), which overprices survival for 9%).

†Originally reported data (without correction).

‡For the complete sample of 47 patients, including 27 GBM and 20 WHO III tumours.

§Since first mEHT (not since relapse).

CR, complete response; BRR, beneficial response rate (ORR+stable disease); EFR, estimated for response; MST, median survival time (Kaplan-Meier estimation); MTTP, median time to progression; N/A, not available; NOP, number of patients; ORR, objective response rate (CR+partial response); OS, overall survival.