Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 28;8(1):10–20. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2275

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The two‐dimensional absolute dose distribution of a central slice is evaluated in three different beam‐delivery methods with 6 MUs. (A) Megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography images with 200 projections; (B) megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography images with 360 projections (from 0 degrees to 359.9 degrees in a clockwise direction); (C) orthogonal pair images.